Research portal · 学术研究
Concepts, claims, and points of dispute
For readers in philosophy, religious studies, ethics, and philosophy of science. No invented academic endorsement—only the system's definitions, arguments, tensions, and versions.
Two-axis model · 双轴模型
Current does not mean empirical
Doctrinal status answers how the community currently rules; claim type answers what method should evaluate it. Confessional status is an additional marker, not an evidence level.
Doctrinal status
The ruling currently operative under the interpretive hierarchy.
Carries structures of meaning without automatically becoming empirical fact.
Preserved as doctrinal history but not the current ruling.
No settled current answer; research and deliberation remain open.
Claim type
Observation, records, and relevant methods
Sources, dating, and textual evidence
Definition, consistency, and inference
Comprehensive interpretation and coherence
Experience, dignity, consequence, and responsibility
First-person experience and its limits
Meaning-structure and narrative context
Rights, procedure, and enforceable rules
Claim index · 命题索引
Twelve located claims
The index is not a new confession; it helps readers trace source and status conflicts.
Comparative position · 比较定位
Kinship, difference, and classification
Comparison does not depend on absolute novelty; family resemblance is itself researchable.
Monism
Shares a nondual account of ultimate reality; adds a stronger account of difference, relation, and normative correction.
Process philosophy
Shares priority of becoming and relation; retains ultimate unity and specific eschatological confession.
Naturalistic religion
Shares respect for natural continuity and scientific boundaries; the Realm and renewed manifestation keep it from strict naturalism.
Pantheism
There is genuine family resemblance; distinctiveness must come from doctrinal structure, not naming.
Emergentism
The seven manifestations and the rise of awareness invite dialogue with emergentism without fixing one scientific mechanism.
Compatibilism
Understands freedom as reflective agency within causal conditions, not uncaused choice.
Internal tensions · 内部张力
Texts that resist easy harmony
Current editing follows later, specific, higher-level rulings; isolated conflicts remain visible in the source.
Unified cosmic consciousness
P00190's certainty conflicts with the later D-level exploratory status and rules permitting multiple interpretations. The site marks it open.
Every memory or some important memories
P04125's ‘every sensory fragment’ is overridden by the General Ruling, the chapter's majority formulation, and the confession: some important memories.
The phrase ‘ghostly substance’
This isolated phrase conflicts with repeated denials of an invisible body. The site uses ‘relational soul becomes personal causal core’ and does not scientize it.
Research questions · 研究问题
Directions not yet closed
The list presupposes no assent and does not treat future research as present proof.
- 01
Can embodied consciousness and postmortem soul-continuity form a noncontradictory model of personal identity?
- 02
How can the One as a metaphysical concept avoid explanatory indistinguishability?
- 03
How should the scope, subject, and memory conditions of causal-domain knowledge be defined?
- 04
Should convergence and renewed manifestation remain purely eschatological, or admit evidence-constrained cosmological models?
- 05
How can founder interpretation be constrained by enforceable independent governance?
- 06
How should civilizational continuation order ecological limits, technological risk, and intergenerational justice?
Citation · 引用
Cite this edition and the source
Website summaries do not replace the canon. Scholarly citation should include the DOCX title, paragraph identifier, site version, and access date.