Governance & transparency · 治理与公开
Power must also be observed
Self-correction is decorative unless it constrains interpretation, conflicts of interest, harm handling, and exit. This page separates canonical rules, institutional proposals, and information not yet publicly available.
Interpretive hierarchy · 解释层级
Conflict is not resolved by arbitrary harmonization
First locate textual level, claim type, and later rulings; then preserve prior language and reasons for change.
- 01
Founding Principles
Defines religious identity and the highest interpretive bounds.
- 02
Integrative General Rulings
Integrates cross-text conflicts and establishes current readings.
- 03
Later Special Fundamental Doctrine
Later explicit rulings on specific fundamental questions.
- 04
General Fundamental Doctrine at the Same Level
Provides general rules where no special ruling applies.
- 05
Fundamental Confession
Concise expression of shared confession.
- 06
Symbolic Narrative
Narrates meaning in image and story without overriding higher explicit rulings.
- 07
Institutional Provisions
Governs organization without independently creating fundamental confession.
- 08
Commentary, Local Tradition, and Personal Opinion
May inform discussion but must identify authorship and status.
Revision levels · 修订级别
The deeper the change, the higher the threshold
Major change may not be disguised as textual clarification. Thresholds come from the canon; whether real institutions exist is stated separately.
Textual and technical
Post-founder: simple majority
Clarifying
Post-founder: three-fifths
General institution and ritual
Two-thirds of the relevant body or local community
Major ethics and organization
Post-founder: three-quarters + public consultation
Systematic doctrine
At least three-quarters; four-fifths for cross-part core relations
Founding principles
If identity principles are abolished, this constitutes a new religion
Proposed institution · 制度设想
The interpretive council does not yet exist
The canon proposes that after the founding period, three constituencies—text and theology; science, history, and logic; ethics, rights, and risk—collectively carry official interpretation. Major rulings cannot remain clerical-only. No constituted roster was provided, so this remains a proposal.
Open QuestionMember rights · 成员权利
Rights salvation cannot cancel
These rights arise from canonical hermeneutics, not institutional goodwill.
- 01Publicly disagree with official interpretation and propose revision
- 02Leave without being defined as spiritually guilty
- 03Retain autonomy over body, property, relationships, medicine, and work
- 04Contact police, medical care, mental-health support, lawyers, and family
- 05Require recusal, independent investigation, and access to records
- 06Disclose serious harm without secrecy or divine-punishment threats
Public register · 公开登记
Known, unknown, and not to be pretended
Absence is not filled with illustrative numbers; it remains visible until real records exist.